Posts Tagged ‘New Church’

How A Friend and Visitor Sees The New Church

Thursday, July 21st, 2011

My friend Matt Stromberg recently wrote and posted a paper he authored on “What is the New Church?”  I posted it below.  Matt is a thorough scholar and a good guy.  Thanks to all of you have who made him feel so welcome when he visited NewChurch LIVE.

In hisMarriage of Heaven and Hell the Poet William Blake asks, “How do you know but ev’ry Bird that cuts the airy way, Is an immense world of delight, clos’d by your senses five?” Like so many others with a mystical bent, Blake sought to experience a world beyond the visible world known to our senses. In June of 1784, a group of intellectuals and spiritual seekers, seeking those same ends, gathered at Bell’s Book Store on South Third Street in Philadelphia to hear a lecture on “The Science of Correspondences.” Among those present were Benjamin Franklin and two other signers of the Declaration of Independence. The lecture explored the teachings of a scientist, mystic, and visionary named Emmanuel Swedenborg. Emmanuel Swedenborg, at the age of fifty-three, believed that he had received a visitation from the Lord Jesus Christ who opened to him the spiritual world.

Not only did Swedenborg discover that everything in the visible world corresponds to a spiritual reality, the doctrine of correspondence, but the interior, hidden sense of the scriptures was also revealed to him. According to Swedenborg the last judgement occurred in the spiritual world in 1757, not on May 21 2011 as believed by some today. The last judgement was followed by the long promised second coming of Christ. The second of coming of Christ was not a physical event, but the spiritual revelation of the interior meaning of God’s Word (discussed above.) Swedenborg, in his book True Christian Religion—one a many volumes of spiritual writings—spoke of a series of ecclesial dispensations, the Adamic, the Noahtic, the Israelitish and the Christian Church of the apostles. Swedenborg believed the revelation he received to mark the beginning of a new dispensation, the coming of a true Christian faith that would be the culmination of all of God’s work in the past. Swedenborg believed that Saint John’s vision of the New Jerusalem corresponded to this heavenly church, and so he spoke of it as The Church of the New Jerusalem. The New Jerusalem Church would finally unite the true and good and establish true charity. His belief was that it would bring the sad divisions within the church to an end establishing a unity based on love of God and neighbour. Swedenborg never sought to institute any outward organisation of the New Jerusalem Church himself.

An Anglican clergyman named John Clowes began to translate Swedenborg’s writings into English and distribute them in his native England. Clowes formed a society of fellow devotees of Swedenborg’s doctrine, but did not seek to break from the established church either. Another believer in Swedenborg’s doctrine, Robert Hindmarsh, was the first to precipitate a break with the established church and the form a separate body. It was James Glen, a convert to the New Church, who brought Swedenborg’s ideas to the United States. In fact Glen was the one who delivered the lecture at Bell’s Book Store in Philadelphia.

Perhaps no one else was more influential in the spread of Swedenborg’s theology in the United States, however, than a missionary named John Chapman. Chapman planted several nurseries of apple trees all across the nation. He also sowed the seeds of Emmanuel Swedenborg’s heavenly doctrine through distributing his writing everywhere he went. Chapman is immortalized in American folklore as “Johnny Appleseed.” Helen Keller was another outspoken advocate for Swedenborg’s doctrine. Keller was influential in spreading Swedenborgian ideas in later years. It was the group that first met at Bell’s bookstore in Philadelphia, however, that would become the beginning of the New Church’s presence in America. On Christmas day in 1815 the group was formally organized as “The First New Jerusalem Society in Philadelphia.” A dispute arose over the authority of Swedenborg’s writings in 1889 which resulted in a schism. One group remained in Philadelphia while the other moved to their new headquarters in Bryn Athyn, founding the Academy of the New Church, and building the beautiful Bryn Athyn Cathedral. The Bryn Athyn group goes by the name, The General Church of the New Jerusalem or simply the New Church.

The New Church’s faith is based on the Bible as illuminated by the revelations of Emmanuel Swedenborg. The New Church, although sharing much, also differs from orthodox Christianity in several key areas. New Church theology rejects the orthodox idea of the trinity as three persons and instead speaks of God as one person, Jesus Christ. What are thought of as distinct persons within orthodox Christianity, are believed by the New Church to be three attributes of the same God, a kind of modalism. The Father is the invisible, divine soul, the Son the visible embodiment of that soul, and the Holy Spirit the truth that flows to all people from the divine soul. God is deeply personal and intricately involved in every area of our lives.

The Bible, along with being a book of history, prophecies, etc also corresponds to Divine Truth, hidden in its symbolism. This Truth is consistent with reason and the external sense of the scriptures and can be used to help us live a life of usefulness to others. The Second Coming is the arrival of that spiritual vision within us. Angels are people who once lived lives like our own and chose a life of usefulness to others or charity, loving God and their neighbour. Every human being was created to be on a spiritual process preparing them for life in heaven. This process involves repentance from sin, prayer, avoiding evil, and living a new life. All people who strive to live a life of goodness, according to the truth within their own faith, will eventually reach Heaven. The New Church does not believe in a physical resurrection. They believe, that upon death, we will pass into the spiritual world where we will live a recognizably human life with the same gender, personality, and memories we had in this life. Hell is a place for those who have denied God and pursued lives of selfishness while heaven is a place where people joyfully serve one another in love.

I first visited Bryn Athyn on a glorious spring morning. I had Van Morrison’s Astrial Weeks on the radio. Morrison’s soulful, mystical music seemed the perfect soundtrack for a place with such a spiritual mystique about it. At the heart of Bryn Athyn is the astonishing Bryn Athyn Cathedral. I’ve never seen the great churches of Europe, but the Cathedral is among the most impressive houses of worship I’ve ever seen. The New Church presence in Bryn Athyn is ubiquitous, a kind of Salt Lake City for Swedenborgians (much smaller of coarse.) The concentration of New Church presence combined within a small town setting, gives one the impression of a very tight nit community.

The people of the New Church are a very warm a friendly group. They are also very devout, committed to Jesus Christ, and dedicated to walking out their faith in a practical and loving way. I was there to meet Chuck Blair, the very earnest senior pastor of New Church Live, for lunch. Everywhere we went friendly members of Chuck’s Church greeted us. Chuck and I had been exchanging emails for quite awhile and he invited me out to talk face to face. He explained to me that his own take on New Church theology was that it was all about “eye level Christianity.” How are we living our faith here and now? Swedenborg taught about a God whose central attribute was love, a love so great that he came to live among us. He also warned about the danger of separating faith from life. Swedenborg sought to reconnect the True (doctrine) and the Good (Charity.) In keeping with Swedenborg’s ideas, the vision of New Church Live is to be “a Monday morning church.” The focus is not just what happens on Sunday mornings but also on how the church’s members live out the gospel the rest of the week. Chuck and I both found deep resonance between this idea and the missional ethos of Biblical Seminary.

I also had the pleasure of worshiping at New Church Live on a Sunday. Chuck’s congregation is unique within the New Church. More traditional congregations, like the one who worships at the cathedral, have services very much reminiscent of a traditional Anglican service. There is a liturgy, a choir, hymns, and special vestments for the clergy. There are also readings from both the Old and New Testaments, the difference being that there is also a reading from the writings of Emmanuel Swedenborg. The Swedenborg reading is usually chosen to illuminate the other text. Also the New Testament readings do not include Acts or any of the epistles with the exception of Revelation. Although those books are held in esteem, they are not recognized as canonical or inspired in the same way.

New Church Live is much different. Services are held in a performing arts centre on the Campus of Bryn Athyn College. It is a casual and contemporary worship service similar to many evangelical churches. The staff, including greeters, AV techs, coffee servers etc all wear T-Shirts with the New Church Live logo emblazoned on the front. The church band sounds more like a bar band than your typical worship band. They tend to play secular, rock songs, but secular songs that have some kind of spiritual or religious content. On the Sunday that I visited, the band performed two reggae songs, one a Bob Marley tune and the other Jimmy Cliff’s wonderful interpretation of Psalm 137, By the Rivers of Babylon. They also played one of my favourite songs by one of my favourite artist, Bruce Cockburn’s All the Diamonds in This World.The music seems to be an effective way of connecting to people where they are. It is very accessible to a secular audience.

Chuck has a very welcoming a relational preaching style that is also very accessible. The service opened with a sneak preview of the upcoming sermon series titled “Love Wins.” The series will look at some of the ideas discussed in Rob Bell’s new book of the same title. The controversial trailer made by Bell to promote the book was projected on the screen and appeared to have a very favourable reception. Chuck told me that he is a big admirer of Bell and other teachers often associated with the emerging church. Bell’s book has stirred up a lot of interest in the New Church. Chuck sent me a link for a podcast on Oprah Winfrey’s website by popular television personality and physician Dr. Oz. Dr. Oz praised Bell’s book as highly compatible with New Church theology. This particular Sunday’s service was not part of the “Love Wins” series, however, but the final sermon in a series called “212.” The series is based on an illustration about the temperature at which water boils. At 211, water begins to bubble, but at 212 it begins to boil. The difference is a matter of one degree.

Chuck presented the question of what it would take in our lives to have that extra bit that takes us from 211 to 212. The series worked out of the Biblical story of David, specifically his anointing by Samuel. This Sunday was focused on David’s well-known battle with Goliath. The exegesis of the scripture, in keeping with New Church principles, was allegorical. David could not defeat Goliath (read the obstacles in our own lives) by pretending to be someone he was not. Saul’s armour was ill fitting and heavy for David. Only by discovering his unique gifts, “God’s fingerprints,” symbolized by the five smooth stones, could David have victory. Like David, we should also discover God’s finger- prints within us, those strengths that are uniquely ours, and use them for the love of God and in usefulness to others. New Church theology teaches us to be angels in training, and angels always think in terms of opportunity to love God and others. With an angelic mindset, we must be constantly vigilant to find opportunities for useful service. We must not simply be content to allow God’s love to flow to us, but we must allow it to flowthrough us to those in need. If we try to keep the blessings of God for ourselves we will loose them. If we allow them to pass through us to others we will find that we are more truly blessed, because real blessing comes through being a blessing to others.

The more we allow ourselves to be useful in this way, the more we will find opportunities to be useful opening up to us. It takes more energy to go from 211 to 212 than in does to reach 211. That one degree extra requires the hardest push and we can easily get caught in the middle and never allow our lives to reach their boiling point. Chuck quoted from author Seth Godin, who writes in his book Linchpin about being an indispensible person, someone who really makes a difference. According to Godin, real change “…depends on motivated human beings selflessly contributing unasked for gifts.” Chuck left us with these thoughts, being a person that really makes a difference in the world requires that we make that extra push to be a 212 person. He said, “We are asked to use our own initiative on God’s behalf.” The service ended with prayer and invitation for people to come forward if they wanted prayer from Chuck or the assistant pastor.

After the service I was invited to join Pastor Chuck and some others at Betucci’s for lunch and fellowship. I had the opportunity to talk to other people about their faith and the New Church. One individual who joined us was Dave Fuller a medical doctor who was writing a book about Swedenborg and Osteopathic medicine. Dave believes in integrating spiritual practices and alternative medicine with modern medical practices, and works out of Holy Redeemer Medical Offices. He was a fascinating person and very helpful as he was extremely knowledgeable about New Church history and theology.

I also met an older couple that were converts to New Christianity from Catholicism. They spoke about how they never felt the spiritual nourishment they needed in any other church, and what an impact being a part of the New Church community has had on their lives and their relationship with God. What particularly attracted them was the openness and tolerance that the New Church has for other faiths. They first came to the church after their daughter planned to have her wedding in the Cathedral. Since then they have been very involved in the church both on Sunday mornings and also in midweek “Strength Groups.” Although their daughter’s engagement actually fell threw, they believe very strongly that God used those events to lead them to the New Church. Everyone I met was very friendly and extremely hospitable. They all encouraged me to come back another time.

My experience with the New Church has been extremely positive. Although I take strong exception to much of their doctrine, I continue to be impressed by their sincerity of devotion. It is humbling to see a friendliness, generosity, piety, and zeal for service that is often lacking in the more orthodox among a group that we would label heretical. I feel that I have made real friendships, especially with Pastor Chuck Blair, and I look forward to continuing my dialogue with the New Church.

… do hereby affirm our belief in … eternal, conscious punishment of the unregenerate in Hell

Thursday, July 14th, 2011

The Southern Baptist Convention, in June of 2011, passed a resolution stating that they “do hereby affirm our belief in the biblical teaching on eternal, conscious punishment of the unregenerate in Hell…”  The resolution specifically targeted Rob Bell’s book “Love Wins.”

Such resolutions are deeply saddening.

It is important to honor, first, that many (most?) Christians – from Baptists to Catholics to those in the New Church – are sincerely motivated to share their faith as a way of helping others find salvation, find resurrection, find new life.  God clearly blesses that motivation.  If we are not sharing our faith – holding it tight out of the mistaken belief that others neither (a) need it or (b) want it – we are far afield from true Christianity.  Christianity does not flourish when we believe we somehow possess it.

And, we in the Christian New Church need to clearly say that the idea of a God who inflicts “eternal and conscious punishment on the unregenerate” is misguided at the best, and calamitous at the worst.

Imagine that kind of God – a God who created a world where – for ALL TIME – individuals who struggle with belief are tortured – actively and consciously – due to their non-belief.  That makes no sense.  That speaks to a pagan, tribal God motivated by conditional love and hatred towards those who fail to offer the proper sacrifice.

It is hard to imagine an image of God more starkly at odds with the image of God presented in Jesus.

The resolution calls the belief in eternal, conscious torment as Biblical.  But is it?  There certainly is room for counterarguments.  Many of those Jesus “healed” and “saved” in no way fit the description many contemporary Christian faiths formally hold of what salvation entails.  The Roman soldier asked Jesus to heal his daughter.  This pagan occupier of the holy land neither underwent baptism, nor declared Jesus his “personal Lord and Savior.”  He simply had faith that Jesus could heal.  And that faith “made him whole.”  Go to a fundamentalist Christian church, ask for their list of what salvation entails and then go to the Bible and see how many times Jesus did that to those he healed.   The answer will surprise.

Statements of course can be pulled from the Bible to create the image of an angry, vengeful God.  Our lives our similar – one could take “sound bites” out of our lives to create any image – from loving to hate filled – that one wished.  And that is why I believe Jesus consistently expounded the Gospel and then returned to the touch stone of love, period.

A loving Jesus and an angry God cannot exist together just as “Hatred and Charity cannot exist together.”  (New Jerusalem and its Heavenly Doctrine).  It is wrong, and dangerous, and deadly.

Is hell eternal?  From a New Church perspective, Emanuel Swedenborg wrote that hell was our choice, not Gods.  The torment that accompanies that choice is self inflicted, not God inflicted.  And those who choose hell are loved, are held closely by God, as He seeks to pull them as close to Himself as they will allow.  God’s work then of salvation goes on to all eternity.  That is the God of love – Jesus Christ – not the God of punishment.

How Do I Keep It Simple?

Friday, July 8th, 2011

From the book “True Christianity” Volume 2, pg. 23:

Friends, abstain from what is evil, and do what is good, and believe in the Lord with your whole heart and your whole soul; and He will give you love for what you do and faith in what you believe.

That is simple.  Often for me life chugs along and then I just hit patches where I feel unteathered, disconnected from God and other people. And at those time, a simple reminder of a simple truth brings me back to center.

What is powerful about this line from True Christianity is that it speaks of our need to follow the God of our understanding and how in doing that, God helps us to have faith (think “confidence”) in what we know and to have love at the core of what we do.  In other words, it is settling into our true selves.  Yes, there is a need there for an external form of revelation as it were – a rock “higher than I” as the New Testament would put it – to pull us out of our petty selves.  And, at the same time it focuses us back on our true selves in a healthy way – our informed perspective on the world, our enlightened view of God, our love.  Put your heart and soul into it and you get your heart and soul.


Love Wins

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

We closed our series “Love Wins” this past Sunday.  What a blessed topic to speak on.

It was a deeply moving moment last week to be up front with the 6 volunteers from the congregation – 3 reading passages from the Bible, 3 listening.  The power of God’s Word is a miracle.  Looking at the faces, and at the tears, of those who were read to was profound.  I am reminded in witnessing that why the Bible through most of history was an oral tradition.  There is simply something in those words.  Our job is to give and receive the power present there – not just the literal words but the spirit within them.

The power is so profound I find myself in constant need to remain quiet in it’s presence, humble in its sphere.

Thank you God for being a space where we can experience that, and live into it together.

What is Partnership?

Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011

(A Paper Presented to Clergy at the 2011 General Church Assembly/ Conference)

New Church theology speaks of the fact that “Divine love constantly aims to forge a partnership with us.”  The relationship God seeks is “a mutual partnership brought about by cooperation not action and reaction.” (TCR 371) How can we, in our limited human ways, try to more effectively cooperate with God’s desire for partnership as we seek to build a church?   How do we make the partnership “mutual and reciprocal?”   If community is “heaven in a lesser form”, how do create community?  (HH 52)

These are critical questions.  Christianity, in the form of institutional religion, faces many challenges.  We are not unique in that regard.  Older models of “church” appear to be fading quickly as congregations age and shrink. The average age for example of a Presbyterian Church goer in the United States is 60.  The same is true in many of our New Church congregations.  Newer models are emerging but remain somewhat undefined and unproven.  Through the process of change, remaining mindful that ‘empting out’ occurs before a ‘filling up’ appears to be of note.

How then are we to navigate these changing waters?  Arguably we, as in clergy, cannot.  We can think long and hard.  We can develop papers and positions.  And yet the future appears to be best served by developing partnership models that pull clergy and laity into an increasingly close, cooperative model based on the partnership model God seeks to establish with each of us and with His church.  Restated, if God desires mutual and reciprocal partnership we need to practice mutual and reciprocal partnership not just with God but with others.  As is noted, we must govern our world as God governs His.   Leadership and partnership then join.

Such a form of leadership entails gaining clarity on the non-negotiables and then allowing new forms to evolve out of those “knowns.”  This occurs in the same way that knowing musical scales or a mathematical equation allows for further growth and creativity.  Through this all the greatest of knowns is love.  What moves us towards being more loving, moves us closer to God.  “To the extent the truth becomes the leader, good becomes obscured; but to the extent good becomes the leader, truth is visible in its own light.”  (AC 2407)

Many lines of new Church theological thought support a partnership model, i.e. “Nunc Licet”, “freedom according to reason” etc….  The role of the clergy then shifts from being resident expert, all knowing seer with answers, to a living partner with the laity.  I believe the Catholic model of God > Clergy > Parishioner does not serve.  The New Church model of God  > People is what does serve.  The special intuition/ perception given to clergy as a function of the clergy’s use is not denigrated in this model.   Arguably it is it even more needed as a way to navigate the difficult, changing waters with grace.

How then, specifically, do we create a church where we live into this partnership model?

Sermon Writing Team

Sermon construction is one core of church life.  The Sunday service and other related services still remain the primary focus of church life.  The focus for many younger adults is clearly shifting away from church attendance as being the key marker of spirituality, however a solid Sunday program that informs and inspires remains central to church life.  Therefore it needs to be fashioned around a partnership model.

People do form communities that we know partner with communities in heaven in ways unseen and unknown.  The Pastor is not the conduit.  The Pastor is just part of the community.   These connections are with “all the varieties of what is good.”  (TCR 15)  So bringing a community together to create the Sunday message appears highly appropriate given the need to draw on these “varieties,” an orientation found in many memorable relationships that speak of gathers of individuals for the purpose of conversation and learning.

A strong, connected teaching of the New Church is that we all possess our own individual spiritual lives.  We, like the disciples, all speak “in unique voices.”  (TCR 146)  Our unique spiritual lives then are not dependent on man-made organizations, formal church structures etc… which attempt to have all sing in one note versus all sing in harmony. And yet there is a continual, and I believe misguided default to seeing the minister as the only one with a grasp of the spiritual – as the one who knows THE note.  As one former bishop noted, a great disappointment he faced often was being a “conversation stopper” in which others looked to him for THE answer.

Yet every week we are actually preaching to a room or auditorium filled with experts.  It is not like a doctor addressing sick patients.  It is like a doctor addressing other doctors.  “Come let us reason together.”  They may be doctors in search of more knowledge, in search of care, in search of community, some of whom may have reached the end of their “knowledge” but we should still assume they are doctors.  We need to remain humble to the fact that what we do not know is “infinite” in comparison to what do know.  (AC 1557)  Therefore as clergy we must reach out to our congregation in the spirit of co-creation, doctor to doctor.  As pointed out in the Arcana, “The Lord’s Church differs from one group to the next, and not only from one group to the next but sometimes from individual to individual.” (AC 3451)

Personally, the creation of a sermon writing team may have been the most significant change at NCL compared to how I formerly functioned.  We employ a team approach from picking topics, to crafting the message, to sharing thoughts/ readings during the service.      I say it without hesitation – the most resonant ideas that I speak are gleaned from the thoughts of others – a fact consistently reinforced week in and week out.

Examples abound.  Our recent series on “Lets Build a Church” included topics that were encapsulated in wording that absolutely got right to the core of the New Church message in language that was highly accessible.  A sermon on “The Empty Chair” for example spoke of the need to keep space open for others in the church.  Of course, the concept was not hard to grasp, but wording/ language such as that opens up the message in new and memorable ways.   The same is true for the graphic for the series.  A volunteer designed it.  It captures the concept of “Church Universal” in a brief, memorable snapshot.

Worship as a Sunday activity is made real by worship as a Monday activity.  This is a clear New Church teaching.

The essential divine worship in the heavens does not consist in going to church regularly and listening to sermons but in a life of love, thoughtfulness, and faith.  HH 222

The Monday morning experts are sitting in the congregation!  They know the experiences of “love, thoughtfulness and faith” in the arena of life better than I do, encumbered by own ego, blind spots, and prejudices.    Importantly, they know the questions.  Clergy, as one author famously noted, must stop answering questions people are not asking.   I believe we better hear what questions are in need of answering if we partner with our congregants.  That requires an outlook more aligned with partnership than has traditionally been the case.

Volunteering/ Ministry

TCR 38 holds that the two essentials of the church are goodwill and faith.  Aligned to the that idea is the concept that “A person who lives a life of faith and compassion is constantly at worship.”  (AC 1618)  The compelling why behind volunteering therefore is self-evident.  And here is another area where the New Church concept of partnership as being “mutual and reciprocal” can be applied in fresh ways.

A traditional approach to volunteering is listing the needs of the congregation and/ or community and then asking who would like to fill what need.  This approach is not without merit.  And yet there is a deeper form of volunteering that seeks to ask people what it is that is calling to be born into their lives.  Out of that grows ministry – a volunteering born of the heart vs. just duty.  Ask out of duty, and someone will deliver their body.  Ask of their heart, and they will deliver their spirit.

Restated, imagine a congregation that is highly effective at tapping into the deeply held loves of its congregants.  In a recent conversation, I shared a laugh with a NCL congregant who is willing to give us 12 hours of her time writing and unwilling to give us 1 hour of her time parking cars on Sunday.  The pastor’s role then is to help her develop that love of writing and to help discuss the avenues where her particular gift can be a made an offering in her church.  And the miracle?  We have people who love parking cars.

Importantly, this deeper partnering allows church to be a dynamic entity.  For example, a typical volunteer list includes (a) hosting/ ushering, (b) music, (c) Sunday school.  NCL has much the same list.  That being said, if a, b, and c are the sole opportunities of giving, what does that in turn say about what church is?  To me it says church is static – limited to a, b, and c – which is hard to support given New Church teachings which center on the fact that love in action is what remains.

In the ministry approach far deeper springs are tapped into.  There is a meeting of a person’s strengths, their loves, and the worlds needs.  Restated in New Church terminology – love, wisdom and use. Through that small convergence in the middle, passion is born, and truly generative service grows.  We are able to give to the given use out of our live and gifts.  And we can trust that God will bring people to our congregations who can fill even the most mundane of tasks with the passion born of useful service.  And where “service rules the Lord is ruling.”  (HH 564)

Out of this approach to growth Small Groups can grow.   Some groups will spring from a more traditional desire within the congregation for instruction.  Other groups will grow from a desire for community or to delve into a topic.  Regardless, the groups will spring from congregational interest.

This ensconces the small groups in relevance.  The congregation requests and forms what they want.  We are to serve spiritual hunger, and spiritual hunger is particular in nature.  Not everyone hungers and thirsts after the same particular thing.  One individual may be excited about a reading group because they are in a learning phase, another may be searching fellowship and are more pulled towards community building.  Therefore creating a process that allows these particular interests to bubble to the surface is important.

Growth

Engaged people engage people.  Engaged people invest in relationships.  Investing in relationships in turn grows a church – the “invest and invite” strategy of evangelization.   In other words, if the congregation takes the partnership model to heart and applies it in their own lives, that partnering in turn will bring others into the church.   If we can create church where the modus operandi is “walking with” that is exactly what we will get.  “If you plant corn, you get corn.”

As Jesus notes in the Gospel of John, “Feed My sheep.”  Yet we live in a world where the primary concern is “Am I fed?”  That is true of many church attenders.  If they feel “fed” they return.  If not, they leave.  And clergy – and I include myself here – can feel that way as well.  Am I “fed” by my congregation?

Growth in a real sense will not come from those merely looking to be fed.  It will come from a counter-intuitive flip of perspective.  This flip is where the concern moves from being fed to feeding.  Can I feed others?  Can I invest in the relationship?  This is the question that must be asked by both laity and clergy.   And that is where compassion and love come alive – true worship.

You continually pray when you are living a life of kindness, although not with your mouth yet with your heart.  That which you live is continually in your thoughts, even when you are unconscious of it.”  (AE 325)

Then we live into the Great Commission, making disciples who carry forth the message – not as piles omniscient teachers but as engaged learners, focused students out to be vehicle for bringing the Kingdom to the world.

How Do We Thrive In God’s Good World?

Sunday, June 19th, 2011

We thrive in God’s good world by living not with one foot in heaven and one foot on earth but with both feet in both.  ”The life that leads to heaven is not one of withdrawal from the world but a life in the world. A life of piety apart from a life of kind service does not lead to heaven at all.”  (Heaven and Hell)

That entails work.  This week we looked at the “New Jerusalem”, God’s prophecy of a new church descending onto earth. In this city, the gates were always open, the light always on.  At the center was no longer a temple but a tree – and not just any tree.  It was the tree of life, the same tree from Genesis – creating a beautiful bookend to the Biblical narrative.

We thrive when we get that this life is not something to escape from but something to engage.  Much of that work will be living into the prophecy of the New Jerusalem – gates open, light on.  That may feel vulnerable.  But we always must question what vulerability is.   This scene from Blood Diamond tells a very different story about vulnerability.  It is a scene in which a father finally finds his son – a young boy kidnapped and trained to be a child-soldier in Africa – and attempts to bring him home.

A different view of vulnerability isn’t it.  And it is what the world needs.  As Brian McClarren noted:

“Perhaps the most promising possibility lies with the thousands of SBNRs (spiritual but not religious) who are waiting for something very much like Progressive Christianity to emerge and get down to business. By “business,” I mean the sacred endeavor of loving God and neighbor, stranger, alien, outsider, outcast, and enemy. I mean the work of healing our broken world, the vocation of doing justice, loving kindness, and walking humbly with God. I mean the spiritual work of forming Christ-like people, and the social enterprise of seeking the common good, beginning with the last, the least, and the lost. Moving forward, little by little, in the robust organic process of God’s will being done on earth as it is in heaven—that’s the progress that Progressive Christianity is about.”

Sounds like the New Jerusalem!  Sounds like thriving in God’s good world.

No Where vs. Now Here

Sunday, June 5th, 2011

“No where” vs. “Now Here” is one of the transformative shifts of life.  We can see our lives and the opportunities essentially as “no where” or we can see those opportunities as “now here.”

The “no where” perspective is fear driven, blinded to the God given opportunities before it.  As with anything, we can actually practice it and that is where the “no where” perspective can become increasingly a shut down, increasingly life into blindness.  In “Divine Providence” Emanuel Swedenborg writes that unless we act on our intentions eventually our real intention becomes unwillingness.  That was an eye opener for me – imagine if my intention was not just the lack of willingness of actual unwillingness!

The “Now Here” perspective, stated simply, is the perspective of angels.  Angels “desire nothing more than to perform useful service.”  (Secrets of Heaven)  Restated, angels life is about the opportunity – seeing it and filling it.  They fill it on their “own initiative on behalf of God.”

Love then is point – not love that grabs and points towards ourselves but love that we allow to flow through our selves.  That is work, no question.  But it is highly practical.  As Seth Godin noted in his recent book “Linchpin”, the future belongs to those who offer “unasked for gifts of emotional labor.”  Welcome to “Now Here.”

To High School Seniors in the Class of 2011

Wednesday, May 25th, 2011

Dear Seniors,

I wanted to take this opportunity to just share a few thoughts as well as wish you all the best moving forward.  I want to start with what you already know – these are uncertain times.  A recent survey noted the following.

In the survey, “The American Freshman: National Norms Fall 2010,” involving more than 200,000 incoming full-time students at four-year colleges: The emotional health of college freshmen — who feel buffeted by the recession and stressed by the pressures of high school — has declined to the lowest level since an annual survey of incoming students started collecting data 25 years ago.

So what is one to do?  The answer is relatively simple – “figure it out.”  We just will figure it out.  To figure it out takes passion, creativity, forethought, curiosity.  I believe it will also take us engaging spiritual resources in a new way.

The concept of “quality of life” as an economic term is ending.  “Quality of life” will be increasingly determined by other factors.  Enter God.  His Kingdom seeks to be born on this earth.  New Church Christianity is not an “evacuation” strategy for leaving this earth and its worries behind.  It is a strategy for engaging this earth, allowing His Kingdom to descend into life – “As in heaven, so upon the earth.”  There is your job!

He put you on this planet at this time simply because you are part of the answer.  Maybe, just maybe you are here to be part of a new generation that will figure it out.   With a big smile, I can say quite honestly, I think you are just that!

When you run low on fuel, NewChurch LIVE is here to support you.  Watch online. Listen to a podcast.  Stay in touch.  We wish you all the best, we wish you a blessed future.

“Love Wins”

Friday, May 13th, 2011

The changes in Christianity are immense.  Rob Bell’s book, “Love Wins”, may just be as this author notes a “game changer.”  I love that idea because Bell’s concept so clearly resonates with many of the core concepts of New Church Christianity.  There is a bigger picture.  Change is occurring in the New Church and throughout Christianity.  It is a change to be embraced.

A Game Changer

May 04, 2011 by John M. Buchanan

When an attendee of Rob Bell’s congregation said that he was certain that Gandhi is in hell, Bell responded, “Really? Gandhi’s in hell? We have confirmation of this? Somebody knows this? Without a doubt?”

Some of Bell’s evangelical brothers and sisters are horrified by his wavering on the doctrine of hell, and Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theo logical Seminary, says Bell’s new book, Love Wins: A Book about Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived, is “theologically disastrous.” “When you adopt universalism . . . you don’t need the church, and you don’t need Christ, and you don’t need the cross. . . . This is the tragedy of nonjudgmental mainline liberalism.”

But Peter Marty, who writes about Bell in this issue, believes that Bell is on to something important—maybe even something game-changing. And as Bell himself says, “[I've] long wondered if there is a massive shift coming in what it means to be a Christian. . . . Something new is in the air.”

Something new is happening. Denominations are struggling to discover new ways to be church. New partnerships are formed between different Christians who share a common sense of mission, and people of every faith are struggling to relate to people of other faiths in a world that has brought us into closer contact than ever before. Within Protestant Christianity, Jim Wallis and Tony Campolo are examples of leaders who graciously reach across the old conservative-liberal theological divide to make common cause with others concerned for a just society and an authentic, respectful evangelism.

It distresses me when people on my side of the divide are accused of arriving at our theological and ethical positions out of a desire to be politically correct instead of out of vigorous study of scripture and theology. It’s also a mistake to lump conservative evangelicals together and accuse them of narrowness and bigotry. I come to my positions on ordination and sexual orientation, reproductive choice, health care and relations with people of other faiths not in spite of scripture but because my study of scripture leads, nudges and prods me. Maybe both sides need to stop relying on generalizations and unkind accusations and give the other the benefit of the doubt, assuming that he or she takes scripture and biblical authority seriously.

Rob Bell is accused of universalism when he imagines Gandhi in heaven. Any of us is subject to the same kind of accusation whenever we suggest a little less certainty and judgmentalism about whom God finally favors and blesses. The point is that when some of us come to that new openness it is not because we ignore the Bible but because we are compelled by scripture’s certainty about God’s steadfast love, the amazing grace of Jesus Christ and St. Paul’s assurance that in Jesus Christ, God intends to reconcile all things.

When the great theologian Karl Barth was charged with being a universalist, he reportedly denied it, but then quoted 1 John: “Christ died for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.” If you are worried about universalism, said Barth, “you had better begin worrying about the Bible.”

Hope and Optimism

Thursday, May 12th, 2011

As is important to note, “Church is a decision to hope and an invitation into the imperfect.”

“Hope” and “Optimism” can be held as slightly different phenomena.  I have met people – and I can be one – with an almost compulsive need to be optimistic.  I don’t like hearing sad stories.  I even struggle to remain in my seat during a sad movie – which means I see about 2 movies a year.  That saccharine”optimism” masks frankly a discomfort with pain and struggle. I am challenged by looking at it “in the eye.”  Ministry is shifting that in time but it is often a struggle.

And what I am learning is that I can sit with others who are in pain, who struggle, and see a deep hope grow in areas where I, in my human smallness, could not imagine hope taking root. And this hope is a sober and at the same time generative hope – one that is able to witness the struggle of life as well as God’s calming and compassionate hand gently holding lives in turmoil.

The miracle for me is that I can decide to hope!   And if I decide to hope, I can then face the imperfect not with a response that recoils from pain, but with response that is able to access compassion – a word literally meaning to “suffer with.”  This hope goes a place where simplistic optimism never could.

Life is filled with hope, if that is the decision we choose to make.  We are after all in the Presence of God – a Presence that deeply loves us and continually calls us home.  That love remains regardless of circumstance – a secret found most profoundly in those whose lives have suffered trials of fire.   To know is to know the imperfect and to know a soul deep, a bone deep hope.

So in that spirit of hope, take 15 minutes and enjoy this short video!